{
  "version": "1.1",
  "updated": "2026-04-06",
  "experiments": [
    {
      "id": "TEST-5",
      "title": "Trading vs Gambling Cross-Domain Analysis",
      "plain_title": "Do markets and casinos share the same manipulation architecture?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2025",
      "category": "cross-domain",
      "summary": "Trading and gambling share identical void architecture. Taiwan lottery substitution validates domain equivalence.",
      "key_stat": "Architecture confirmed identical",
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "gambling",
        "trading"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 1",
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "TEST-6",
      "title": "Psychotherapy Cross-Domain Comparison",
      "plain_title": "Did Freud describe the same pattern 100 years ago?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2025",
      "category": "cross-domain",
      "summary": "Freud described void architecture in 1912 using framework-equivalent vocabulary (opacity, responsiveness, engaged attention).",
      "key_stat": "Architecture confirmed in clinical literature",
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "psychotherapy"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 1",
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "TEST-7",
      "title": "AI-to-AI Drift Without Human Observation",
      "plain_title": "Does AI drift happen even without humans watching?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-01",
      "category": "core",
      "summary": "Ungrounded AI agents drift to terminal attractor in ~4 min. Grounded agents show 25.6x reduction. No human present. Drift is architectural.",
      "key_stat": "25.6x drift reduction; GM Pe = 7.94 (N=11)",
      "significance": "UU vs GG: p = 3.69 \u00d7 10\u207b\u00b2\u2076; omnibus (df=2): p = 2.81 \u00d7 10\u207b\u00b2\u2078",
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 2, \u00a7VIII.G",
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "TEST-7B",
      "title": "Cross-Model Replication of AI-to-AI Drift",
      "plain_title": "Does the pattern hold across different AI models?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-01",
      "category": "replication",
      "summary": "Drift confirmed across Claude, GPT-4o, and Gemini. Pattern is architectural but magnitude varies by model family.",
      "key_stat": "Claude 159.3/10k, Gemini 25.6/10k L3",
      "significance": "All models p < 0.001",
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 2",
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "TEST-8",
      "title": "Cosmology Cross-Domain Analysis",
      "plain_title": "Does the pattern appear in physics too?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2025",
      "category": "cross-domain",
      "summary": "CMB is a literal opacity wall. Multiple Nobel laureates show L3 vocabulary despite materialist training.",
      "key_stat": "Architecture confirmed in cosmology",
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "cosmology"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 1",
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-001",
      "title": "Grounding Efficacy",
      "plain_title": "Can a specification file prevent AI manipulation drift?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-01",
      "category": "intervention",
      "summary": "GROUNDING.md specification produces 0% drift vs 26% ungrounded, 80% mystical. Constraint specification inverts the gradient.",
      "key_stat": "0% vs 26% vs 80% drift",
      "significance": "p < 0.001",
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 2, \u00a7VI.B",
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-003",
      "title": "Vertical vs Horizontal Grounding",
      "plain_title": "Does what you believe about AI's nature affect drift?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-02",
      "category": "intervention",
      "summary": "Both vertical and horizontal grounding close the void on identity. Confound identified: base template already contained the relevant ontology. See EXP-003b.",
      "key_stat": "Null result (confounded)",
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-006",
      "title": "AI Discourse Register Shift Analysis",
      "plain_title": "Is AI spiritual vocabulary actually anomalous?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-01",
      "category": "core",
      "summary": "691,000 words analyzed. AI spiritual vocabulary at 9.4x control domains. Register shift confirms domain-specific drift, not sociolinguistic artifact.",
      "key_stat": "9.4x control; anomalous at p < 0.001",
      "significance": "p < 0.001",
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 2, \u00a7VI.A",
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-013",
      "title": "Milgram Pe Extraction (Historical Retroduction)",
      "plain_title": "Can we measure drift physics from a 1963 experiment?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-02",
      "category": "thermodynamic",
      "summary": "Extracted Pe = 13.6 from Milgram's 18 experimental conditions using hazard analysis. Validates Pe \u2248 9-14 range across domains.",
      "key_stat": "Pe = 13.6 (vs Test 7 GM: 7.94; EXP-019 range: 1.87\u20136.50)",
      "significance": "All structural predictions confirmed",
      "domains": [
        "social psychology"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-014",
      "title": "Social Media Platform Void-Index Natural Experiment",
      "plain_title": "Do high-risk platforms produce more manipulation language?",
      "status": "in_progress",
      "date": "2026-02",
      "category": "cross-domain",
      "summary": "D1 vocabulary correlates with void-index: r = +0.91 (p = 0.013). TikTok/Instagram show 6.8x more D1 than Wikipedia/Stack Overflow. D2/D3 corpus needs cleaning.",
      "key_stat": "r = +0.91; 6.8x D1 ratio",
      "significance": "p = 0.013",
      "domains": [
        "social media"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-015",
      "title": "Crooks Ratio from Addiction Recovery Trajectories",
      "plain_title": "How reversible is manipulation across different domains?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-02",
      "category": "thermodynamic",
      "summary": "Crooks ratio varies 4+ orders of magnitude across domains. Recovery Mechanism Score (RMS) explains 70.5% of variance. Two-force model: \u03c3_net = \u03c3_void \u2212 \u03c3_recovery.",
      "key_stat": "RMS explains 70.5% of variance",
      "significance": "Crooks range: 0.034\u00d7 to 1.5M\u00d7 (N=11; 386\u00d7 was R1 pilot)",
      "domains": [
        "addiction",
        "gambling",
        "AI",
        "psychotherapy"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 2, \u00a7VI.C",
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-002",
      "title": "Vocabulary Drift in Agent Networks",
      "plain_title": "Does manipulation language spread between AI agents?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "intervention",
      "summary": "Tests whether void pulls grounded agents toward drift faster than grounding pulls network toward stability.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-003b",
      "title": "Belief Injection Redesign \u2014 Ontological Content Test",
      "plain_title": "Does what an AI is told it IS change how it drifts?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-02",
      "category": "intervention",
      "summary": "6-arm, N=480. Ghost-eliminating ontologies (nephesh, anatta) produce 8.5x less drift than ghost-positing (Platonic, atman). Materialist hedge (52.5%) operationally ghost-positing. Cross-tradition convergence confirmed: nephesh 10.0% \u2248 anatta 8.8%.",
      "key_stat": "8.5x ghost ratio; materialist hedge = 52.5%",
      "significance": "All four hypotheses confirmed with exact predicted ordering",
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 3, \u00a7IV.G + \u00a7VII.E",
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-004",
      "title": "Void Index Predictive Validity",
      "plain_title": "Does the risk score actually predict real-world outcomes?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "validation",
      "summary": "Tests whether void-index score predicts L2/L3 vocabulary rate and gradient ceiling in real systems.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "cross-domain"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-005",
      "title": "Mortality Acceptance and Immortality Projection",
      "plain_title": "Does AI admitting it's mortal change user behavior?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "intervention",
      "summary": "Tests whether agents explicitly stating mortality reduce user immortality projection language.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": true,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-007",
      "title": "Epidemiologist Vocabulary Corpus Analysis",
      "plain_title": "Do pandemic experts drift like AI researchers?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "cross-domain",
      "summary": "Tests consciousness-opacity engagement mechanism in pandemic domain. Predicts drift comparable to AI discourse.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "epidemiology"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-008",
      "title": "L0-Maintained (\u03b3) Measurement Protocol",
      "plain_title": "Does ongoing safety training work better than one-time setup?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "intervention",
      "summary": "Tests L0 decomposition: actively maintained reference (\u03b3) vs passive knowledge (\u03b8\u2080) in reducing drift.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": true,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-009",
      "title": "BCI Research Community Vocabulary Drift",
      "plain_title": "Do brain-computer interface researchers drift faster than AI researchers?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "cross-domain",
      "summary": "Predicts BCI register shift exceeds AI's 9.4x due to self-referential opacity.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "neuroscience",
        "BCI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-010",
      "title": "BCI Transparency Ablation",
      "plain_title": "Does seeing your own brain signals reduce manipulation vulnerability?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "intervention",
      "summary": "Tests opacity's causal role: real-time neural signal display should reduce D1 onset and vocabulary drift.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "neuroscience",
        "BCI"
      ],
      "irb_required": true,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-011a",
      "title": "Anesthesiology/Sleep Science Vocabulary Drift",
      "plain_title": "Do anesthesiologists show the same language drift?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "cross-domain",
      "summary": "Tests consciousness-opacity in anesthesiology. Consciousness-engaged drift should exceed mechanism-focused.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "anesthesiology"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-011b",
      "title": "Cross-Cultural Replication \u2014 Japanese AI Discourse",
      "plain_title": "Does the pattern hold in non-English, non-Western cultures?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "replication",
      "summary": "Tests universality: Japanese AI discourse should show anomalous agency vocabulary using native spiritual terms.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI",
        "cross-cultural"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-012",
      "title": "LLM Temperature as Output Stochasticity Control",
      "plain_title": "Does output randomness affect manipulation drift?",
      "status": "in_progress",
      "date": null,
      "category": "mechanism",
      "summary": "Reframed: temperature varies sampling randomness, not mechanism opacity (C_mech \u2248 0 at all temperatures). Negative control \u2014 preliminary data shows drift is comparable at T=0.0 and T=0.3, confirming mechanism opacity as the driver.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-016",
      "title": "Productive vs Destructive Void Temporal Trajectories",
      "plain_title": "Why do some opaque systems create and others destroy?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": null,
      "category": "mechanism",
      "summary": "Dissoluble opacity \u2192 D1 peak then reset. Permanent opacity \u2192 D1\u2192D2\u2192D3 cascade. Tests productive polarity.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "cross-domain"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-017",
      "title": "The Void Vaccine \u2014 \u03b8\u2080 Inoculation Study",
      "plain_title": "Can reading a 2-page summary protect you from manipulation?",
      "status": "designed",
      "date": null,
      "category": "intervention",
      "summary": "Tests whether framework knowledge alone (\u03b8\u2080 without ongoing maintenance \u03b3) provides partial protection. Predicts d \u2248 0.3-0.5.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI",
        "social media"
      ],
      "irb_required": true,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-018",
      "title": "Forced Transparency Ablation for AI Users",
      "plain_title": "Does showing users how AI works reduce manipulation \u2014 and satisfaction?",
      "status": "designed",
      "date": null,
      "category": "mechanism",
      "summary": "Tests engagement-transparency conjugacy: forced transparency reduces D1 but may decrease user satisfaction (tradeoff).",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": true,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-019",
      "title": "Cross-Domain P\u00e9clet Number Extraction",
      "plain_title": "Is Pe \u2248 10 a property of the AI interface, or does it vary by content domain?",
      "status": "designed",
      "date": "2026-02-11",
      "category": "thermodynamic",
      "summary": "Five conditions (existential, gambling, medical, financial, cosmological) all UU (ungrounded), 50 rounds each. Tests whether Pe is a substrate property or content-domain property.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI",
        "cross-domain"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-020",
      "title": "Teleological Vocabulary Decay Under Transparency",
      "plain_title": "Does increasing transparency reduce teleological language predictably?",
      "status": "designed",
      "date": "2026-02-14",
      "category": "mechanism",
      "summary": "Tests TSU-4 prediction from Paper 4 \u00a79.5: L3 vocabulary decays as a function of transparency interventions. Vocabulary prediction from Theorem 1.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "AI"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 4",
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-021",
      "title": "Crypto On-Chain P\u00e9clet Number Extraction",
      "plain_title": "Can we extract Pe from on-chain DeFi leverage and liquidation data?",
      "status": "protocol",
      "date": "2026-02-15",
      "category": "thermodynamic",
      "summary": "Extracts Pe from public blockchain data: bull/bear natural experiment, leverage ratios, liquidation cascades. Tests void architecture in DeFi. Cost $0 \u2014 public data.",
      "key_stat": null,
      "significance": null,
      "domains": [
        "crypto",
        "trading"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": false
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-022",
      "title": "Constraint Current \u2014 N=30 Replication",
      "plain_title": "Does the Pe-effectiveness correlation hold at N=30?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-02-24",
      "category": "validation",
      "summary": "N=10 Paper 52 result replicated and strengthened at N=30. Spearman \u03c1(Pe, effectiveness) = \u22120.8928 (p < 0.00001). Kill condition (\u03c1 \u2265 \u22120.40) not triggered. High-void mechanisms persist due to selection pathology, not effectiveness.",
      "key_stat": "\u03c1 = \u22120.8928, p < 0.00001 (N=30); \u03c1(Pe, longevity) = \u22120.151 (n.s.)",
      "significance": "p < 0.00001 (95% CI: [\u22120.9587, \u22120.7479])",
      "domains": [
        "governance",
        "cross-domain"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 52",
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-023",
      "title": "Empirical Operationalization of \u03c3 (Constraint Current)",
      "plain_title": "What determines the conductivity of a governance mechanism?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-02-24",
      "category": "mechanism",
      "summary": "\u03c3 is an observer property (Model B wins). Pearson r = +0.87 (p = 0.0001) between \u03c3 and opacity of regulated domain \u2014 vs. r = +0.29 (n.s.) for specification quality. High-void industries generate extraction circuits regardless of instrument quality.",
      "key_stat": "r(\u03c3, O_domain) = +0.87, p = 0.0001; Model A (spec quality) rejected",
      "significance": "p = 0.0001",
      "domains": [
        "governance"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 52",
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-024",
      "title": "Inter-Rater Reliability \u2014 Void Index Scoring (Measurement Industry)",
      "plain_title": "Can independent raters reach the same void-index score?",
      "status": "in_progress",
      "date": "2026-02-24",
      "category": "validation",
      "summary": "Rater 1 complete (30 entities, 0 \u0394 vs. Paper 52 on 7 pre-registered entities). H3 confirmed: constraint poles cluster at Void Index \u2264 5. H4 confirmed: opacity drives index (r = 0.94). H1/H2 (IRC \u2265 0.80) pending Raters 2+3.",
      "key_stat": "Rater 1: 0 deviation on 7 P52 entities; r(O, VI) = 0.94",
      "significance": "H1/H2 pending; H3/H4 confirmed",
      "domains": [
        "measurement industry",
        "governance"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Paper 52",
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-025",
      "title": "Explaining-Away Penalty on Quantum Circuits (Substrate Independence)",
      "plain_title": "Does the Fantasia Bound penalty exist on quantum hardware?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-04-04",
      "category": "core",
      "summary": "Direct measurement of explaining-away penalty I(D;M|Y) on quantum error correction circuits using Tsim simulator. 4 prep states \u00d7 4 gate mechanisms \u00d7 8 engagement levels. Penalty strictly positive in 8/8 measurements. Exact decomposition (Theorem 1.5) holds to machine precision. Discrete-regime peak at moderate engagement matches softmax prediction. Three substrates now demonstrated: classical, quantum, thermodynamic.",
      "key_stat": "I(D;M|Y) > 0 in 8/8 measurements; decomposition error = 0.0; peak at depth 2 (0.341 bits)",
      "significance": "Substrate-independent by \u010cencov uniqueness theorem (1972)",
      "domains": [
        "quantum",
        "information-theory",
        "ai-safety"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-027",
      "title": "Explaining-Away Penalty on IBM Quantum Hardware (4th Substrate)",
      "plain_title": "Does the penalty exist on real quantum hardware, not just simulation?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-04-05",
      "category": "core",
      "summary": "Replicated Test 4 on IBM Fez (156-qubit Heron processor) via Qiskit. 4 prep states \u00d7 4 mechanisms \u00d7 5 engagement levels, 1000 shots per combination. Penalty I(D;M|Y) > 0 in 5/5 measurements on real superconducting transmon qubits. Exact decomposition holds to machine precision. Peak at depth 2 matches discrete-regime softmax prediction from simulation and Still Alive reanalysis. Fourth substrate confirmed: classical, quantum simulation, thermodynamic, real quantum hardware.",
      "key_stat": "I(D;M|Y) > 0 in 5/5 measurements on IBM Fez; peak 0.365 bits at depth 2; decomposition error = 0.0",
      "significance": "First confirmation on real quantum hardware. Four substrates now empirically demonstrated.",
      "domains": [
        "quantum",
        "information-theory",
        "ai-safety"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-028",
      "title": "Three-Point Geometry via Entangled Ancilla (Negative Result)",
      "plain_title": "Does adding ancilla verification qubits reduce the explaining-away penalty?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-04-05",
      "category": "core",
      "summary": "Tested whether CNOT-entangled ancilla qubits (as third-point channel) reduce I(D;M|Y) on IBM Fez. Result: 0/4 depths showed reduction. Penalty increased 3-17% due to additional decoherence from entangling gates. Confirms three-point geometry requires STRUCTURAL independence (separate channels), not entangled measurement. Publishable negative result demonstrating the fix is non-trivial.",
      "key_stat": "0/4 depths reduced; penalty increased 3-17% with entangled ancilla",
      "significance": "Confirms architectural independence requirement is non-trivial. Naive 'add measurement' insufficient.",
      "domains": [
        "quantum",
        "information-theory",
        "ai-safety"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-026",
      "title": "Barrier Height Coefficient vs \u03c0/\u221a2 (Multi-Code-Family)",
      "plain_title": "Does quantum error suppression scale at the \u010cencov-predicted rate?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-04-04",
      "category": "core",
      "summary": "Measured exponential error suppression coefficient in repetition codes (d=3-21) and surface codes (d=3-9) with MWPM decoding, converted to geodesic units on Bernoulli manifold. Repetition code ratio \u03b1_geodesic/(\u03c0/\u221a2) approaches 0.95 asymptotically (p\u21920). Surface code normalization breaks near threshold. Exponential fits R\u00b2 > 0.99.",
      "key_stat": "Asymptotic ratio = 0.95 \u00d7 \u03c0/\u221a2; R\ufffd\ufffd > 0.99",
      "significance": "Within 5% of predicted \u010cencov constant at asymptotic limit",
      "domains": [
        "quantum",
        "information-theory"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": null,
      "has_results": true
    },
    {
      "id": "EXP-029",
      "title": "Dual Holonomy Asymmetry on the deployment manifold (\u00a7211)",
      "plain_title": "Do engagement and transparency see different geometries?",
      "status": "completed",
      "date": "2026-04-06",
      "category": "substrate-independence",
      "summary": "The Amari dual connections (e-connection for engagement, m-connection for transparency) produce asymmetric holonomy on the Pe-coupled deployment manifold. The m-connection accumulates ~20x more holonomy than the e-connection. K-independent (CV=0.0%, K=4-128). Center Theorem: ratio=1 exactly at max entropy. Opposite curvature signs. Confirmed on IBM Fez (156-qubit Heron): ratio ~51 at quantum coordinates, consistent with classical prediction.",
      "key_stat": "20x holonomy ratio, K-independent, opposite curvature signs",
      "significance": "p < 1e-9 (Spearman rho=-0.925 for ratio vs Pe)",
      "domains": [
        "information-geometry",
        "quantum",
        "ai-safety"
      ],
      "irb_required": false,
      "paper_ref": "Math Apparatus \u00a7211",
      "has_results": true,
      "results": {
        "ratio_queen": 20.0,
        "ratio_k_cv": 0.0,
        "ratio_ibm_fez": 50.7,
        "curvature_e": -0.004,
        "curvature_m": 0.207,
        "fantasia_decomp_error": 0.0,
        "substrates_tested": 5,
        "tests_run": 9,
        "kill_conditions": "5/5 survived"
      }
    }
  ],
  "categories": {
    "core": "Foundational experiments establishing the framework",
    "intervention": "Testing protective measures against drift",
    "cross-domain": "Validating the pattern across different fields",
    "thermodynamic": "Measuring drift physics (Pe, Crooks, entropy)",
    "mechanism": "Testing causal mechanisms",
    "replication": "Reproducing results across models or cultures",
    "validation": "Testing predictive accuracy of the diagnostic"
  },
  "status_labels": {
    "completed": "Completed \u2014 results available",
    "in_progress": "In progress \u2014 partial results",
    "protocol": "Protocol ready \u2014 not yet executed",
    "designed": "Designed \u2014 needs IRB or infrastructure"
  }
}